Lust in the Light
Previously published on March 30th, 2015
‘Do not be overcome by evil but overcome evil with good’ (Rom. 12:21).
All sins are not created equal. Overeaters wear their vice in plus-sized outfits; the slothful bear a gloomy countenance, swathed in grave clothes. Both confess their sins wordlessly. Yet the lustful can radiate good health from overheated frames, giving the appearance of order while driven by disordered desires that, if conceived, commit violence against all involved. Let’s not compare a breakfast of brownies or dour self-doubts to the one sin that St. Paul claims most opposes one’s own body (1 Cor. 6:18) while violating intimacy with Jesus. (vs. 13-17)
Lust is a secret sin that incurs the shame of wasting one’s generative powers; that shame can further isolate the sexual sinner from openly expressing his/her vice. Yet the technology that now drives lust has so obliterated our good shame that we are now nearly shameless, naked and on fire, losing the feeling of exposure that demands what only the Lamb can provide.
With the help of Google Fiber, split seconds exist between any lustful thought and a perverse pornographic image that sears itself on the heart, to be recalled on a whim. Lust begins with disordered curiosity and ends up disordering our desires by awakening passion it only frustrates. Good gifts we are, yes, but lust lures us to pervert the essence of that gift in cheap exchanges that bankrupt our most precious offering. Even the shameless can feel its futility. Scripture claims that the law is written on our hearts (Rom. 2:15), which testifies to the truth that God made us to give ourselves only where committed love creates an openness to life.
Any fluency on this topic is because of my sordid history; lust is my most deadly sin. For this, I feel blessed shame, a gift in light of my rather shameless background. Growing up on the California beach during the sexual revolution, we ‘spent’ our bodies to buy new sensations. Although my inclinations were homosexual, lust may better define what drove and derided me. The Catholic Church smartly defines lust as sexual pleasure sought for itself, without the goals of lasting communion and child-bearing, and cites masturbation, pornography, fornication, and homosexual practice as among its expressions (CCC 2351-2359). Sexual immorality is an equal opportunity offender. For all who lust, we have an Advocate, the ‘Lamb who takes away the sin of the world’ (Jn. 1:29).
The Lamb leads us to purity, or better put, to chastity, which is the stern and splendid task of integrating our sexuality within both our bodies and our spirits (CCC 2337). What a long and invigorating adventure! His unfailing love enables our daily surrender to Jesus and His members. Through trustful confession, accountability, and ongoing prayer, He pours Himself out upon us and accesses the heart’s true cry for love and connection. We learn to love real people. Over time, Jesus helps us to become chaste and so overcome our disintegration, the lustful tendency to dart from real love to fantastic counterfeits.
Along the way, many of us welcome the call to offer our bodies to one person over a lifetime. Jesus and His bride prepared me for Annette. With her, I learned to focus my sexual energies in the context of loving a person who was like me and yet profoundly ‘other than me’—body, soul, and spirit. I praise both marriage and the Lamb who was slain. Together, the two reclaimed for me the gift of sexual love from the distortions of lust.
‘Jesus has given us the possibility of realizing the entire truth of our being: He has set us free from the domination of lust’ (St. John Paul II, Veritatis Splendor).
Sounds like you've been googling gay porn again
"disordered curiosity" Just those two words. From the Garden to the internet. Did God say? Yes, He did. Thank you for sharing the truth, Andrew.